Talk:New Testament Textual Criticism
From Theopedia
Nice work on the article. It's looking really good. Maybe you are already in the process of doing this, but it'd be good to get a good intro statement going. Also, what do you think about redirecting other pages here, such as Textus Receptus, Majority text, Alexandrian text and so on? I wonder if for now they can link here, and once more is written then perhaps they will deserve their own pages.
On a last note, it may be a good idea to slip in somewhere that MSS=Manuscripts. This will help make more sense of Wallaces quote (which is a great quote by the way). JordanBarrett 12:36, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)
- I think your suggestion to link the related terms to this page makes good sense. Also, I agree we still need an introduction. I just ran out of steam for the time being. I also needed to do some real work to pay the bills. :-) Gomarus 12:47, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)
Suggested additions
"Notable disputed passages" Here's a start for its contents:
- Ending of Mark (Mark 16:9-20--this is definitely the most disputed passage in the New Testament, even Warfield stated that the ending of Mark has been irrecoverably lost.)
- John 8's account of the woman caught in the act of adultery
— unsigned comment by Alex Woehr (talk • contribs)
