Perseverance of the saints

From Theopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Perseverance of the saints is the Calvinist doctrine that those who are truly saved will persevere to the end and cannot lose their salvation. It doesn't mean that a person who is truly saved will never lose faith or backslide at any time. But that they will ultimately persevere in faith (inspite of failures) such as not to lose their salvation.

The doctrine of perseverance is rooted in God's unconditional election and predestination. That is, since God is the One who chose and predestined the elect to salvation, therefore the elect will be saved. They might turn away from faith and give appearance of losing their salvation, but if they really are elect they will repent and ultimately return to faith, because God is the One ensuring their salvation.

This doctrine is also closely related to the doctrine of justification and adoption. Because God is the One who justifies the elect, no one can bring any condemnation on them. In the same way because those who truly believe in Christ are adopted as God's sons, they cannot be condemned to eternal punishment (although subject to God's loving discipline as a Father).

See Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 17.

Multimedia

Contents

History of the doctrine

The traditional doctrine is one of the five points of Calvinism that were defined at the Synod of Dort (1618-1619) during the controversy over Arminian teaching, which objected to the general predestinarian scheme of Calvinism.

The doctrine of perseverance is articulated in the Canons of Dort (chapter 5), the Westminster Confession of Faith (Chapter XVII), the London Baptist Confession of 1689 (Chapter 17), and may also be found in other Reformed Confessions.

Eternal Security

"Eternal security" is often seen as synonymous with "Perseverance of the saints." That is, a person who truly trusts in Christ, may have assurance of eternal life with God, and thus be eternally secure. Historically, this comes from a biblical, Calvinistic framework, wherein salvation is secure because the perseverance of the saved person is certain.

Today, however, the doctrine of eternal security is usually expressed without the reference to the perseverance (or continuance) and other means of grace indicative of true saving/justifying faith. This mind-set goes hand-in-hand with the "easy believism" and "carnal Christianity" so prevalent in the evangelical church today. It is characterized by the trite phrase "once saved, always saved", suggesting that one may continue in a life of willful sin and be confident of salvation because he has made a profession of faith in the past. This goes against biblical exhortations, warnings for final salvation and qualifications of true saving faith. For example :

Definitive wandering is deadly and maybe a sign that one is not truly saved. Christians in the bible are warned and encouraged over and over again to not give up, but to persevere in faith in order to be saved. "Blessed is the man who remains steadfast under trial," as James says, "for when he has stood the test he will receive the crown of life, which God has promised to those who love him." (James 1:12)

Quotes

"We do not teach that any man is entitled to believe that he is justified, and therefore shall not come again in condemnation on the proposition "once in grace always in grace," although he be now living in intentional, willful sin. This falsehood of Satan we abhor. We say, the fact that this deluded man can live in willful sin is the strongest possible proof that he never was justified, and never had any grace to fall from. And, once for all, no intelligent believer can possibly abuse this doctrine into a pretext for carnal security. It promises to true believers a perseverance in holiness. Who, except an idiot, could infer from that promise the privilege to be unholy?" (R. L. Dabney, The Five Points of Calvinism)
"How preposterous and irrational must it be in a man who thinks himself to be a child of God, and believes he shall persevere to the end, from this consideration to indulge himself in all manner of sin, as if resolving that he will persevere no longer!" (John Gill, The Cause of God and Truth, Part 3, section 6)

Biblical support

These passages show God's ability to save completely those He had chosen to save.

In the following passages, the point is that one has been truly saved (past tense/ past event), if he perseveres to the end. Otherwise, he proves he had never been truly saved.

Other passages that affirm the need to endure to the end to be saved.

Arminian Objections

Arminian objection to this doctrine is primarily centered on the concept of man's free will (in the Libertarian sense). That is, God does not predetermine or influence the individual's choice, but He lets them choose freely their destiny. In such an understanding, God neccessarily cannot ensure the final salvation of anyone because they always have the free choice to turn away from faith.

Arminians generally have their own interpretation of Calvinist proof texts for the doctrine of Perseverance. Arminians will appeal to a conditional election or corporate election understanding of Calvinist security verses. While there are different ways for Arminians to interpret Calvinist proof texts, but the bottom line is that they will always put the final decision for salvation on the free choice of individuals, not on God.

Arminians will also use verses that give warnings against falling away from faith, to argue against the doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints. They also argue from verses that appeal for a decision on the individual to persevere. That is, the individual has to make the decision to persevere, and God cannot make them persevere if they don't want to.

It should be noted however, that historic Calvinism affirms the need to persevere to be saved, and the need for the individuals to actively believe and persevere. This creates an antinomy (or paradox) since Calvinism equally affirms that God is completely sovereign in the affairs of men, including human decisions. For example :

Calvinists also argue that if God is not sovereign over the decisions and choices of individuals, then it would be pointless to pray for the salvation of anyone, or repentance of someone in sin. Furthermore, all the verses that promise protection or security to the believer would be pointless, because God will apparently not prevent someone from falling from faith. The power of God's new covenant promises would be pointless and ineffective, the blood of Jesus insufficient to complete the purchase of individuals.

Resources

See also

External links

Favorable

Critical

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox